Monday, March 28, 2011

Lesson 7: You are not what you buy

While watching NCAA basketball this weekend (and lamenting about my bracket, which is now officially just a list of teams that lost) I caught a commercial that really irritated me. It was the latest ad for Miller Lite’s Man Up campaign.

The ad featured a man golfing with friends while also drinking his no-name “light beer.” Immediately after his first swing, he is mocked by both his friends and nearby women for having mistakenly teed off from the women’s tee. He then continues to be ridiculed for not being a “real man,” which is compounded by the fact that he doesn’t drink Miller Lite (apparently the only “real” beer). The ad is but one in a series of commercials that consistently creates a strong gender differentiation between men and women, and then harshly reinforces the idea that anything associated with the opposite sex is “wrong” or “inferior.”


The message that Miller Lite seems to want to send to its viewers is that if you don’t drink the right kind of beer, then you must be a woman, and being a woman is bad. The Man Up campaign consists of several ads in which a man chooses not to drink Miller Lite, consequently making him “less masculine” then other men. In fact, he is so much less masculine that he must be a woman (because of course, women have no idea what a good beer tastes like). Take a look below.

Wow, so if you don’t drink Miller Lite, then you must be a skirt-wearing sissy. And people who wear skirts are losers (even women think so! We must all hate each other). The fact that in many of these ads Miller Lite portrays women delivering the gendered insult conveys a false veil of safety for the company; therefore, if women are making the offensive remark, then it must be ok to be sexist or misogynistic.  

Other Man Up ads feature men who don’t order Miller Lite beer being scorned for having female characteristics such as: having a lower back tattoo, wearing a thong (to which the bartender taunts, “Don’t get your panties in a bunch”), carrying a purse, or wearing skinny jeans. And of course the commercials are quick to have surrounding cast mates in the advertisement jeer at the man who made the female mishap. They poke fun at him for being inferior to other men who choose to drink Miller Lite. I’ve posted a few commercials below for your viewing pleasure.

I can only conclude that Miller Lite either a.) hates women, b.) has no women working for them, or c.) thinks that women don’t drink beer.

In reality, these commercials are offensive to both men and women. Miller Lite demands an extreme level of gender conformity, and insists masculinity (or femininity) is defined by your characteristics and tendencies, not by your sex.  

This strict adherence to cultural gender roles is seen throughout several companies’ advertisement campaigns, reinforcing that we, as viewers, must obey the unspoken societal rules that determine whether we are a man or a woman. Remember the Old Spice man? Of course! Because he smells like a real man, not like a woman, as he points out in this commercial several times.


Anyone remember the Dockers commercial that reminded men how important it is to "wear the pants," both literally and figuratively? Because you have to wear Dockers pants if you want to be considered a "real man."

 
Using gender labels to guilt consumers into buying products is a common practice in today’s advertising techniques, but it’s important for us to remember that we define who we are, not the cultural myths that we are socialized to believe. Take pride in yourself and don't assign false value to material things. No beer, clothing, perfume, or car will make you either more or less of a man or woman than you already are. What you buy does not determine who you are. Today’s lesson: Don’t let anyone brand you into something you are not. Don’t let yourself be an easy target for those companies that prey on consumers’ insecurities. Create your own labels and value your individuality. Only you can decide who you are. These commercials aimed at making us feel as if there is some stereotype we must conform to (or live up to) are growing old. Gender roles today are becoming more blended and less conventional as acceptance for diversity increasingly grows in society. Don't let these ads subconsciously cast you into a mold; uniformity is boring.

8 comments:

  1. "In reality, these commercials are offensive to both men and women. Miller Lite demands an extreme level of gender conformity, and insists masculinity (or femininity) is defined by your characteristics and tendencies, not by your sex."

    Fairly certain you have this reversed... Gender is not biologically determinate as your current phrasing would indicate - even the most basic critical comm. theory takes that to be an incorrect stance (which is why I think you have it reversed or are making an argument you probably don't want to be making - the argument I think you want to be making is that saying that certain gendered characteristics are bad or wrong is the problem in the ads...)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Quite right, according to critical comm theory your gender is not defined by your sex. However, I am not writing from strictly a critical comm theory standpoint, but rather a broader position of societal norms that most people can relate to.

    The broader point that I was trying to make here is that these advertisements have created two distinct and impossible gender conformities, defining men as one thing and women as another. The ads leave us to believe we must take on specific characteristics in order to be proper members of our sex - rather than being members despite the traits that we possess.

    Great comment, love the feedback, please keep coming back :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Makes sense - just didn't read that way. Even then, the way it reads now reinforces public (incorrect) opinion that gender is part and parcel with a framework of biological determinism which, critical comm theory aside, is patently incorrect.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I understand what you are saying, but I hope you aren't getting too caught up in the language and missing the overall theme I was attempting to present, which was that the products we purchase don't necessarily represent the traits we possess - beyond that of masculinity and feminity. (ie - specific alcohol won't make you cool, certain clothing labels won't make you beautiful, etc).

    ReplyDelete
  5. Coming from a non-comm background, which is audience I believe the blog is also trying to connect to, I think the article makes sense. In layman's terms, gender is "The sex of an individual, male or female, based on reproductive anatomy" (dictionary.com). So maybe I'm just not understanding what you are saying using comm theory terms, but to the general public, the word choice is fine.

    I have a comment about the skinny jeans part too. I don't think that video is attacking women like the other ones do. The comment is on men who wear those skinny jeans and how they are not masculine. So, while it doesn't fit into the formula of assaulting female traits, it does fit into your idea of them categorizing masculinity and feminity.

    Another great article Meg.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thank you! I'm glad that this point is not completely lost on the general public, you are right that is definitely an audience I am trying to connect with. I'd like to make communication interesting at a universal level that we can all relate to, beyond the academic jargon often heard in the communication field.

    Good catch on the skinny jeans, I agree it is not so much insulting females as it is insulting males who don't conform to the most common socially accepted fashion trends and styles. Still, it insinuates that "only women would wear skinny jeans" and therefore only women would have bad taste in beer. Just my two cents, but I think it could go either way.

    Love to see the comments this thread is pulling! Thanks for the input!

    ReplyDelete
  7. The commercials are offensive if taken seriously. I think it is more offensive that all the women in the commercial are good looking and the guys are all slobbish. No bar seriously has that many good looking women at one time in one place, unless there being paid, and thats another story all together. Just not gonna happen.
    Second, more importantly, today's "Man" has no way short of physical prowess and "labels" that show another he is in fact a man's man. So yes labels show women we are in the game and on the hunt. Labels are important to women and we "Men" know it. Therefore we care for labels, because we care about sex... with women or men (depending the types of labels your wearing of course).

    Next time your in a bar, scope out the men with Heiniken vs the men drinking Budweiser. Both are legit crappy tasting beers next to a say Sam Adams but one portrays a label of affluence the other does not.

    Loving your blog, keep it coming!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Mike, you make a good point. Men appearing slobbish/low class while taking on insults about their intelligence is a common theme seen on television today. Men are often portrayed as aloof, stupid, and out of touch. I'll try to do a future post on that topic.
    As for the women, again I agree with you. It's like a beauty contest was going on in those bars. That's the image and standard of beauty that females are socialized to live up to, and it is exhausting.
    I think you are right about labels being important to women, but I also think those labels have become important after years of media reinforcing them in our culture.
    Great insight, thanks for commenting. :)

    ReplyDelete